Morris A Hill
UK Guide 2025
Band 2 : Court of Protection: Health & Welfare (Public Sector Clients)
Band 2
About
Provided by Morris A Hill
Practice Areas
Morris joined Weightmans in 2007, having previously spent 10 years working for in-house local authority teams, latterly as a Principal Solicitor. Morris specialises in all aspects of public law, with a particular emphasis on social care, healthcare and education. Morris regularly acts for local authorities in matters relating to child protection and children with disabilities, adult protection and best interests determinations, applications before the Court of Protection, general community care obligations, ordinary residence disputes, mental health law, commissioning and contractual arrangement and charging. He advises local authorities and individual schools on school organisation, exclusions and admissions, SEN provision, school transport and general strategic advice. His healthcare clients include hospital and mental health trusts and ambulance services to which he provides general healthcare law advice, particularly in relation to mental health/capacity law, consent issues and provision of and withdrawal of treatment.
Morris also has an interest in all aspects of public and Human Rights law and information governance. He frequently advises his public sector clients on responding to requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and their obligations under data protection legislation. He also regularly provides training to lawyers, clinicians and other medical staff and local authority officers.
Morris has been recognised for a number of years as a ‘Star Associate’ and ‘notable practitioner’ by Chambers & Partners in the category of Court of Protection: Health & Welfare (Public Sector Clients). He also sits as a Fee-paid Judge of the First-tier Tribunal (Health, Education & Social Care Chamber).
Morris has acted in a number of reported and important cases, including:
• HH v Carmarthenshire CC & Ots [2023] EWCOP 18 (whether the same judge can make best interests decisions in respect of more than one person)
• Fixsler v Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust [2021] 4 WLR 123 (withdrawal of life sustaining treatment)
• An NHS Trust v ZA [2021] EWCOP 39 (below the knee amputation)
• Surrey CC v NHS Lincolnshire CCG [2021] 2 WLR 805 (claim for restitution/NHS Continuing Healthcare)
• A Local Authority v H (No.2) [2019] 2 WLUK 767 (capacity to have sexual relations, but not contact)
• R (Paul Worthington) v HM Senior Coroner for Cumbria & Others [2018] 12 WLUK 124 (challenge to Coroner’s conclusions)
• R (City of Wolverhampton Council) v South Worcestershire CCG & Shropshire CCG [2018] EWHC 1136 (Admin) (responsible commissioner)
• In The Matter of Human Fertilisation Embryology Act 2008 (Case M) [2016] Fam Law 1089 (declaration of parentage)
• HM Senior Coroner for Cumbria v Ian Smith [2015] Inquest LR 235 (application by Coroner to quash previous Coroner’s decision)
• GP v Deby City Council [2012] EWHC 1451 (consultation with NR)
• Wirral Borough Council v Salisbury Independent Living [2012] HLR 25 (meaning of ‘person affected’ for the purposes of the Child Support, Pensions and Social Security Act 2000)
• A Local Authority v H [2012] 1 FCR 590 (the test for capacity to enter sexual relations)
• R (RH) v SSHD & Wigan BC [2010] EWHC 2414 (age assessment)
• R (Broster & others) v Wirral BC [2010] EWHC 3086 (Refusal to provide Personal Budgets)
• DCC v KH [2009] (CoP) (Use of standard authorisation to return to placement)
• R (Culkin) v Wirral Independent Appeal Panel [2009] ELR 287 (school exclusion)
• W PCT v TB & S MBC, CW NHS Trust & W MBC [2010] 2 All ER 331(Mental Health Act 1983 / Mental Capacity Act 2005)
• R (F & Others) v Wirral BC [2009] BLGR 905 (community care / Supporting People Programme)
• R (Manchester CC) v St Helens BC & PE [2009] WLR (D) 319 (ordinary residence dispute)
• R (St Helens BC) v Manchester PCT [2008] Times, October 6 (NHS continuing healthcare)
• St Helens BC v PE & JW and Manchester PCT [2007] 2 FLR 1115 (best interests under the inherent jurisdiction)
• E v Channel 4 V Channel 4 & News International Ltd and St Helens BC [2005] 2 FLR 913 (injunction/declaratory relief)
• R (on the application of Haggerty & Others) v St Helens BC [2003] HLR 69 (care home closure)
• R v Dr Finnegan & DE ex parte Wirral Health Authority and Wirral BC [2001] MHLR 66 (effect of quashing order on MHRT decision)
• R v Chief Schools Adjudicator, ex p Wirral BC [2001] ELR 574 (challenge of decision of the adjudicator)
• R v (1) Wirral BC (2) Governors of Elleray Park School, ex p B [2001] ELR 266 (special educational needs)
• R v Schools Adjudicator, ex parte Metropolitan Borough of Wirral [2000] ELR 2620 (challenge of decision of the adjudicator)
Chambers Review
UK
Morris Hill is particularly active for local authorities, offering representation in Section 21A and deprivation of liberty challenges concerning individuals with significant care needs. He also acts on issues surrounding residence as well as capacity to enter sexual relations.
Strengths
Provided by Chambers
"Morris is a very good all rounder who is reasonable to deal with."
"Morris is very down to earth, pragmatic and incredibly bright. He really does do complex cases exceptionally well."
"Morris is a very good all rounder who is reasonable to deal with."
"Morris is very down to earth, pragmatic and incredibly bright. He really does do complex cases exceptionally well."