Christopher S Williams

Practice Areas

Appellate Proceedings Litigation

Business, Corporate and Commercial Litigation

Employee Benefits/ERISA Litigation

Health Care Litigation

Career

Chris Williams is a Partner with Calfee's Litigation practice group. He regularly represents clients in corporate and commercial business litigation matters, including healthcare disputes. As lead counsel, Chris has prevailed in multi-million dollar jury and bench trials in Ohio and across the country.

Chris currently serves on the Boards of Directors of College Now of Greater Cleveland, the Cleveland Law Library and the Ohio State Legal Services Association. For the past 15 years, since the program’s 2006 start, Chris volunteers during the school year at Cleveland’s John Marshall High School as a U.S. government and law instructor as part of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association’s 3Rs (Rights-Responsibilities-Realities) program.

Chris served as Co-Chair of Calfee’s Litigation Department for 11 years (2011-2021). He currently serves on the firm's Management Committee and its Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Committee; he serves as Chair of the Pro Bono Committee.

Professional Memberships

Judicial Conference of the 8th Judicial District (Cuyahoga County), Life Member

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Foundation, Fellow

College Now of Greater Cleveland, Board of Directors

Cleveland Law Library, Board of Directors

Leadership Council on Legal Diversity, Mentor

College Now Greater Cleveland, Mentor

Legal Aid Society of Cleveland, Volunteer Lawyers Program Participant

Publications

Articles

“The U.S. Supreme Court Dilutes ERISA's Statute of Limitation Defense for Fiduciaries,” Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP First Alert (March 2020), Co-author

“Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal Continue to Circumscribe the Instances in Which ERISA Plan Administrators May Rely on an Internal Plan Statute of Limitations,” Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP First Alert (September 2015), Co-author

“Sixth Circuit Clarifies When the Terms of an ERISA Summary Plan Description are Binding,” Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP First Alert (August 2015), Co-author

“Third Circuit Expands the Scenarios Under Which ERISA Parties May Recover Attorney’s Fees,” Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP First Alert (May 2015), Co-author

"U.S. Supreme Court Rejects “Presumption of Prudence” But Sets High Bar for Plaintiffs to Survive Motions to Dismiss ERISA Stock-Drop Suits,” Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP First Alert (June 2014), Co-author

“The U.S. Supreme Court’s Reverence for Unambiguous ERISA Plan Terms Returns to Plan Administrators Some Needed Control Over ERISA Benefits Lawsuits,”Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP First Alert (June 2014), Co-author

“States face battle when adding requirements for ACA counselors, navigators,” Managed Healthcare Executive Magazine (March 2014), Co-author

Expert in these Jurisdictions

Ohio

Experience

Representative Business, Corporate, and Commercial Litigation Matters:

Currently (2024) representing the Plaintiffs, a California life sciences company and related parties, in a multi-million-dollar corporate governance, fiduciary duty, stock option, and contract dispute arising from the mismanagement of an Ohio company by certain conflicted and misbehaving owners and managers, which litigation has already forced the targets to seek protection under Delaware's bankruptcy laws.

Obtained a $6 million summary judgment decision from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas in 2021 against a host of Los Angeles-based real estate developers arising from the doomed sale-leaseback of a landmark Cleveland office building. The losing parties appealed to the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals but the appeal was unsuccessful and collection efforts are now underway against the Los Angeles parties.

In 2020 obtained summary judgment for one of the nation's largest retailers in a commercial lease dispute with an Ohio real estate developer arising from the Calfee client's business decision to shutter one location in favor of a new location nearby. In addition to prevailing on the contract dispute, the federal court judgment also awarded attorneys' fees to Calfee's client.

Culminating in a 2020 Ohio Supreme Court Order, successfully represented a Colorado public company and its former CEO in litigation matters resulting in judgments against and collections from an Ohio company totaling more than $5.8 million in compensatory and punitive damages, plus a $1.1 million sanctions and attorneys' fees award, which award was affirmed by the 11th District Ohio Court of Appeals in 2019 and the Ohio Supreme Court in 2020.

Between 2012 and 2018, represented two of Ohio's four casinos, and obtained judgment in the casinos' favor with respect to federal and state constitutional claims asserted by a national anti-gambling organization. The losing plaintiffs filed five separate appeals, including twice to the Ohio Supreme Court and one failed effort before the US Supreme Court, and final judgment was entered in 2018.

In 2016 represented one of Ohio's largest steel companies in a multi-million-dollar three-week jury trial arising from a $100 million construction project gone awry.

In 2014, defended a publicly held Ohio bank against federal court allegations of lending and collections fraud and negotiated a nuisance value settlement of plaintiff's claims.

In 2012, presented oral argument to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta and obtained final judgment affirming the district court's order dismissing the adverse parties' federal claims arising from alleged fraud, RICO, and conspiracy activities relating to failed Florida real estate investments.

Successfully established a lack of personal jurisdiction in Ohio and obtained a final judgment in 2012 from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio for a large North American parking management company in a dispute with a competitor arising from their joint venture at the Toronto Pearson International Airport.

In 2011, summary judgment was awarded to Calfee's publicly held client in a case alleging alter ego and corporate veil theories against the client arising from a failed Cleveland real estate venture.

In 2010, represented a publicly owned Ohio bank in a class-action lawsuit arising from alleged false and fraudulent mass mailing advertisements; the case was dismissed with prejudice by the court with the granting of Calfee's motion to dismiss.

In 2010, obtained summary judgment for a plaintiff bank against one of Ohio's largest auto dealers arising from a fraudulent loan and auto purchase scam.

Representative ERISA/Health Care Litigation Matters:

Currently (2024) defending two putative class actions – one filed in 2017 on behalf of 600 Ohio governmental entities and the other filed in 2022 on behalf of more than 1,000 non-government parties – in which the plaintiffs are asserting healthcare billing fraud, contract and statutory claims arising from the administration of self-insured health care plans over a 10-plus year period.

Currently (2024) defending a NYC-based international benefits and HR consulting firm in a federal court ERISA and RICO class action relating to the client's alleged intentional and negligent misconduct regarding pension plan consulting and actuarial services.

In 2017 represented a publicly held Cleveland company in connection with multi-million-dollar claims against it arising from golden parachute/change-in-control agreements entered into with former company executives. Final judgment in favor of Calfee's client was entered by the trial court, was affirmed by the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals, and the losing plaintiffs unsuccessfully sought Ohio Supreme Court review.

In 2016, defended Ohio's largest health care insurance company in separate, multi-million-dollar billing fraud lawsuits, one of which resulted in a final judgment disposing entirely of the plaintiffs' $22 million causes of action, and the other of which resulted in a negotiated zero cost dismissal.

In 2013, while representing the public company employer, obtained a federal court preliminary injunction freezing the current and prospective assets of all four adverse parties in a multi-million-dollar healthcare benefits dispute arising from the mismanagement and underfunding of welfare plans.

In 2012, appeared for a preliminary injunction hearing in Newark, NJ federal court, the hometown of the opposing party, one of the world's 10 largest insurers, and defeated the insurer's request for an order prohibiting Calfee's client from assigning to a third-party a multi-million-dollar administrative services agreement.

Following extensive fact and expert discovery and summary judgment briefing before the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, favorably settled, in 2011, ERISA fiduciary duty and prohibited transaction claims filed by the bankruptcy trustee on behalf of an insolvent public company against its former officers and directors.

In 2010, following oral argument, obtained affirmation from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals of a summary judgment award in an ERISA case involving Plan Administrator discretion, the appropriate standard of appellate review, and the interplay between written Plan terms and alleged conflicting oral representations.

In 2009, finalized a $27 million settlement against an international financial adviser arising out of the Calfee pension plan client’s losses due to investments made in Bernard Madoff-related funds.

In 2009, on cross-motions for summary judgment filed after three days of evidentiary hearing, successfully limited an ERISA plaintiff to a small fraction of his sought-after $9 million in damages and attorneys' fees arising from the administration of a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.

Arguing ERISA preemption and standing issues before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2005, obtained judgment affirming the Louisiana district court's summary judgment on behalf of three clients. The companies had been sued in Louisiana state court for $2.4 million, arising from their alleged violations of Louisiana's bad faith insurance statute.

In 2005, obtained an American Arbitration Association award on behalf of Ohio's largest Medicaid health care provider following state court litigation and a multi-day arbitration hearing arising from Medicaid billing fraud and breach of contract allegations against the client.

Education