Email address
[email protected]Contact number
+44 20 7862 4807Share profile
Band 3
Provided by Dan Jones
Fintech
Blockchain and Virtual Currency
Technology & Innovation
Technology Companies Group
Ethics & Compliance
Private Wealth
Dan has experience across the full spectrum and life cycle of financial services firms: from determining whether the firm's products or services are the subject of financial services regulation, assistance in obtaining a regulatory license, interpretation of applicable regulations and implementation guidance through to M&A regulatory due diligence and skilled person's reports in the event of regulatory investigation.
His clients include global retail and investment banks, asset managers, e-money issuers and payments services providers, crypto-asset issuers, wallets and exchanges.
Dan's notable work includes advice to the UK Open Banking implementation body, the development of a digital only retail bank for a U.S. headquartered global bank and preparing the regulatory license application for a leading global payment services provider.
Before joining Orrick, Dan spent more than a decade working in UK ‘magic circle’ law and ‘Big 4’ consulting firms, advising leading fintech's on regulatory issues across the UK, Europe and the Middle East.
Provided by Chambers
Dan Jones is a financial services regulatory lawyer with a strong practice in blockchain and cryptocurrency matters.
Provided by Chambers
Dan is a visionary in his field and very adept at weaving his landscape knowledge with his legal capabilities. We are in safe hands with Dan.
Dan was fantastic throughout. We had a tight turnaround to get a deal over the line and Dan got us that analysis rapidly. The analysis was accurate and dealt with a complex, unclear regulatory area.
Dan is a visionary in his field and very adept at weaving his landscape knowledge with his legal capabilities. We are in safe hands with Dan.
Dan was fantastic throughout. We had a tight turnaround to get a deal over the line and Dan got us that analysis rapidly. The analysis was accurate and dealt with a complex, unclear regulatory area.
