David Shavin KC
Global Guide 2024
Band 1 : Intellectual Property: The Bar
Band 1
About
Provided by David Shavin KC
Practice Areas
David Shavin KC has practiced in the fields of Intellectual Property and Competition Law in Australia for over 45 years and in New Zealand since 1994. He was appointed a QC (now KC) in Australia in 1993 and in New Zealand in 1994.
He apears predominantly in trials and appeals in the Federal Court of Australia and has conducted several appeals in the High Court of Australia. He has conducted trials in the High Court of New Zealand, and appeals in Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of New Zealand.
His Intellectual Property work has involved a large number of both trials and appeals. His patent work has focussed predominantly on life sciences patents and computer implemented inventions. His patent work has encompassed all areas of patent infringement and validity, and especially issues as to what constitutes a manner of manufacture in Australia.
His trade marks and confidential information work has concerned all aspects of the validity, use and infringement of trade marks, including paricularly colour and shape marks post the 1995 Act.
David has been involved in many of the ground breaking competition cases, especially those concerning the abuse of market power, anti-competitive conduct and the nature of the penalty regime in both Australia and New Zealand. He has been involved in a large number of merger matters.
In the High Court, the patent matters in which he has appeared have involved nature of patent eligible inventions (manner of manufacture) especially for patents related to isolated nucleic acids and computer implemented invention and whether a patentee's rights are exhausted after first sale. In the area of competition law, his cases have concerned cartel conduct, price fixing, and explored the essential nature of s.46, the nature of predatory pricing and the extent to which it is caught by s.46.
In New Zealand, his cases have involved the abuse of a dominant position, input pricing and also interchange fees in the banking sector.
He appears for both innovators and generic companies in life sciences matters, and for and against the regulator in competition matters.
Career
David Shavin was admitted to practice in Victoria in 1977, signed the Victorian Bar roll in 1978 and took silk in 1993 in Victoria. He is also admitted to the State Courts in New South Wales, Queensland and Tasmania. He was admitted to practice in New Zealand in 1994 and appointed a Queens Counsel (now Kings Counsel) in 1994.
Between 1983 and 1992 and in 1995, he lectured with the late Professor Maureen Brunt and others in post-graduate multi-disciplinary course in Advanced Trade Practices (Competition law and economics) in LLM, M.Ec and MBA programs conducted successively at Monash and Melbourne Universities and at the Melbourne Business School.
Professional Memberships
He is a member of IPSANZ and has been a member of the Business Law Section of the Law Council of Australia committees on Intellectual Property and Trade Practices (Competition) since about 1983.
He is a member of the Institute of Patent and Trade Marks Attorneys of Australia.
He is also a member of the General Law Section of the Law Council and the Practice and Procedure Liasion Committees for both the Federal Court of Australiaand the Federal Circuit Court (and its predecessors) since July 1998.
He is and has been since about 1989 a member of the Competition Law and Policy Institute of New Zealand.
Clients
His clients include many of the major international innovator companies in the life sciences sector, producers of generic pharmaceuticals and companies in the technology and computer implemeted inventions sectors. In competition work in Australia, he has acted in many matters for the ACCC and for major public companies in both Australia and New Zealand
Expert in these Jurisdictions
Australia and New Zealand
Education
B.Ec; LLB (Hons) (Mon)
Chambers Review
Global
David Shavin KC enjoys both a national and a regional reputation for his work in the IP space. He is best known for his work on patent cases, though also an experienced handler of trade mark issues, and he offers particularly focused expertise on pharmaceutical matters and questions of what materials can legitimately be regarded as patentable.