Ranking tables
Motor Insurance Fraud | UK Bar
All Circuits
Rankings overview for Sets
Band 1
- Peter J Wilson Park Square Barristers9 Years Ranked
- Kiril Waite7BR
- Paul HigginsCrown Office Chambers
- Paul McGrathTemple Garden Chambers
- Sadie Crapper39 Essex Chambers
- Steven TurnerKings Chambers
Band 2
- Anastasia Karseras 2 Temple Gardens9 Years Ranked
- Fiona Ross Park Square Barristers1 Years Ranked
- Howard Cohen Farrar's Building7 Years Ranked
- Roger André Deka Chambers2 Years Ranked
- Anna Symington12 King's Bench Walk
- Anthony JohnsonTemple Garden Chambers
- Edward HutchinTemple Garden Chambers
- Ella DavisDeka Chambers
- Henry Morton Jack2 Temple Gardens
- James HoggDeans Court Chambers
- James LaughlandTemple Garden Chambers
- James PatersonDeans Court Chambers
- James RozierTemple Garden Chambers
- Rory HolmesCrown Office Chambers
- Simon McCannDeans Court Chambers
- Simon TriggerDeka Chambers
- Timothy SharpeTemple Garden Chambers
All Sets profiles
Band 1
1 Temple Garden ChambersMotor Insurance Fraud2025 | Band 1 | 10 Years RankedTemple Garden Chambers is a highly regarded set described as having "a wealth of knowledge at its disposal," offering unrivalled expertise and bench strength in insurance disputes involving serious allegations of fraud. Its barristers are a strong choice for insurers facing matters involving exaggerated personal injuries, staged accidents, credit hire frauds and fabricated documentation. The set represented the insurers in Aviva v Sakyi, a committal application where the High Court found the original claimant to be in contempt of court and sentenced them to seven months' imprisonment.
Band 2
2 Deans Court ChambersMotor Insurance Fraud2025 | Band 2 | 7 Years RankedDeans Court Chambers contains "excellent and highly skilled counsel, who are able to handle high-value fraud claims with varying degrees of concerns," acting for both claimants and defendants across the breadth of motor fraud cases. Members are frequently sought out to handle matters involving complex factual and legal questions and arguments of fundamental dishonesty. The set offers further capabilities in contempt of court proceedings. Members acted for the defendant in Goodwin v Muller UK, where the claim was dismissed as fundamentally dishonest.2 Deka ChambersMotor Insurance Fraud2025 | Band 2 | 2 Years RankedDeka Chambers has particular expertise representing insurers in personal injury cases with motor fraud elements and has a track record of success proving fundamental dishonesty. Members are experienced in tackling matters stemming from staged accidents and low-speed impacts. The set is also capable of handling cases of complex credit hire fraud and fraud rings. Recent instructions include Eeswarakumaran v Direct Commercial in which a strike-out of an RTA PI claim on the day of trial was obtained. A commentator notes: "Deka Chambers has a strong understanding of required strategy and the wider market impact."2 Park Square BarristersMotor Insurance Fraud2025 | Band 2 | 8 Years RankedPark Square Barristers possesses "a plethora of barristers who are capable of handling complex and sophisticated matters to a very high standard," acting for defendant insurers across a spectrum of insurance fraud disputes. Members of the set are highly capable in matters involving exaggerated injuries and induced accidents. The set offers further strength in achieving cost orders against third parties, including solicitors and rehabilitation treatment providers. Recent instructions have included Balcevicius v Fletcher, an RTA personal injury case.