
Shanghai Beshining Law Office
Share profile
About
Beshining is a well-known brand for intellectual property and legal services, headquartered in Shanghai, and has branches or offices in Xi'an, Ningbo, Chongqing, Changsha, Qingdao, Hangzhou, Guangzhou and Houston, USA.
Our team has been formed for over 20 years and currently houses nearly 300 personnel. We have provided thousands of clients at home and abroad with comprehensive intellectual property and domestic and overseas legal services, including patent, trademark, copyright, layout-design of integrated circuits, anti-unfair competition and trade secret.
Beshining consistently handles each case with an unwavering commitment to responsibility and professionalism, offering clients intellectual property and legal services that are of the utmost quality, efficiency, and expertise.
In the past year, Beshining has successfully handled a large number of cases, including routine intellectual property agency cases, corporate legal consultation, and various important and complex types of litigation cases, such as patent invalidation and litigation, trademark opposition and litigation, and various civil lawsuits, winning high recognition from clients.
Ranked Offices
Provided by Shanghai Beshining Law Office
- Shanghai29th Floor SFECO Mansion 681 Xiaomuqiao Road , Shanghai, Shanghai, China, Shanghai 200032,
Shanghai Beshining Law Office rankings

Articles, highlights and press releases
1 item provided by Shanghai Beshining Law Office
A Comparative Study on the Examination Practice of AI-related Patent Applications from a Multination
This article provides an in-depth comparison among IP5 in terms of subject matter eligibility, claim formats, novelty and inventive-step assessment for AI-related inventions. A comparative analysis is provided on subject matter eligibility through a hypothetical case.
A Comparative Study on the Examination Practice of AI-related Patent Applications from a Multination
This article provides an in-depth comparison among IP5 in terms of subject matter eligibility, claim formats, novelty and inventive-step assessment for AI-related inventions. A comparative analysis is provided on subject matter eligibility through a hypothetical case.