Ana Diculescu-Şova
Europe Guide 2024
Eminent Practitioners : Dispute Resolution: Litigation
Email address
[email protected]Contact number
+40 21 201 1200Share profile
Eminent Practitioners
About
Provided by Ana Diculescu-Şova
Practice Areas
Dispute Resolution
Career
Ana Diculescu-Șova heads the firm’s Dispute Resolution practice and has an impressive career, with over 50,000 appearances before national and international courts and arbitration panels to represent clients in a wide range of disputes. International legal guides and clients describe her as a leading figure in the dispute resolution practice area, being considered “a guru of her generation” by market commentators.
Mrs. Diculescu-Șova founded Ana Diculescu Law Office, which merged in 2001 with Nestor Nestor Kingston Petersen creating Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen. She was also an ad hoc Judge of the European Court of Human Rights.
Professional Memberships
Bucharest Bar, International Union of Lawyers
Chambers Review
Europe
Ana Diculescu-Şova heads the dispute resolution team and has a considerable reputation in the market thanks to her expertise in disputes and specialisation in fiscal litigation. She is frequently seen acting on cases pertaining to VAT, profit tax and transfer pricing.
Strengths
Provided by Chambers
"Ana Diculescu-Șova is a great orator and an esteemed lawyer - among the best."
"Ana Diculescu-Șova is a great orator and an esteemed lawyer - among the best."
Articles, highlights and press releases
4 items provided by Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen
NNDKP obtains a decision to refer questions to the Court of Justice of the European Uni
NNDKP obtains a decision to refer questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union to clarify the lawfulness of an electrical energy production surcharge
NNDKP obtains a decision to refer questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union to clarify the lawfulness of an electrical energy production surcharge
NNDKP obtains a decision to refer questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union to clarify the lawfulness of an electrical energy production surcharge
NNDKP obtains a decision to refer questions to the Court of Justice of the European Uni
NNDKP obtains a decision to refer questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union to clarify the lawfulness of an electrical energy production surcharge
NNDKP obtains a decision to refer questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union to clarify the lawfulness of an electrical energy production surcharge
NNDKP obtains a decision to refer questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union to clarify the lawfulness of an electrical energy production surcharge